JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon denies involvement with Jeffrey Epstein
JPMorgan Chase’s chief government Jamie Dimon affirmed underneath oath that he by no means met the financial institution’s former consumer Jeffrey Epstein, nor was concerned in any inside choices to retain the disgraced late financier after considerations have been raised about his intercourse crimes, the corporate mentioned on Friday.
Throughout sworn testimony on Friday, “our CEO repeatedly confirmed that he by no means met with [Epstein], by no means emailed him, doesn’t recall ever discussing his accounts internally, and was not concerned in any choices about his account”, the financial institution mentioned in a press release.
“There are hundreds of thousands and hundreds of thousands of emails and different paperwork which have been produced on this case and never one comes near even suggesting that he had any function in choices about Epstein’s accounts.”
The assertion got here after the 67-year-old was deposed for seven hours by attorneys for an unnamed Epstein accuser and the US Virgin Islands, the place Epstein had a house, as a part of two lawsuits by which JPMorgan is accused of cashing in on human trafficking by offering monetary companies to the late intercourse offender over a 15-year interval.
Nevertheless, a lawyer for the unnamed accuser, Brad Edwards, accused the financial institution of giving a “cherry-picked self-serving quote to the press”.
“Reasonably than mislead anybody about what was or was not mentioned, why don’t they only conform to launch the entire transcript? . . . Then the world can put their remark in context and resolve for themselves what they considered Mr Dimon’s testimony as an entire,” Edwards added.
JPMorgan later clarified Dimon had merely “reaffirmed after his deposition” that he didn’t know Epstein.
The sworn deposition of Dimon, one of the vital highly effective figures on Wall Avenue, marked one of many largest moments thus far within the Epstein-related lawsuits filed final yr, which have shone an unflattering mild on JPMorgan’s inside compliance processes and embarrassed key executives.
Whereas proof gathered prior to now few months revealed a number of senior managers on the financial institution have been concerned in discussions about Epstein’s crimes, there was a single reference in an e mail to Dimon doubtlessly needing to overview the intercourse offender’s accounts.
JPMorgan has denied such a overview ever occurred.
Earlier on Friday, a federal choose in New York heard arguments from representatives of the Epstein accuser, who contend that doubtlessly lots of of ladies must be entitled to compensation from the financial institution.
Sigrid McCawley, a lawyer for Jane Doe, instructed the courtroom there was “clear proof within the report that the financial institution knew of Epstein’s conduct . . . beginning within the early 2000s” and argued that his crimes necessitated JPMorgan, which had Epstein as a consumer from 1998 to 2013, turning a “blind eye”.
Attorneys for JPMorgan argued that alleged victims had “very completely different experiences” and may thus not be allowed to sue as a single group. It has denied legal responsibility and countersued its former government Jes Staley, whom it accuses of deceptive the financial institution about Epstein’s actions.
Staley has disputed the financial institution’s claims.
Decide Jed Rakoff mentioned he would rule on the movement to certify the case as a category motion by June 20.